« Winners pt2 | Main | Thoughts from Mark Hancock »
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834bb8ad053ef00d834bb8ad753ef
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Winners pt3:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||
| 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
| 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |
| 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 |
Outstanding conference.
We have to do it again next year because it could be utterly awesome if we finessed it a little.
I could have done with some more really big thinkers and more really big thinking not just people's usual schtick - there were some real exceptions to this (Greg, Justin, Chris in particular).
Oddly enough I think the result was right - Russell was quite genuinely offering the biggest thinking yesterday.
I loved the voting - not for the act of finding a 'winner' but because it transfered the power from the speakers to the delegates - the first conference that I have ever experienced that has achieved this.
And I am guessing but I reckon it got the speekers to raise their games with real variety in the styles of presentation.
Posted by: richard | October 12, 2006 at 01:09 PM