« Winners pt2 | Main | Thoughts from Mark Hancock »
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834bb8ad053ef00d834bb8ad753ef
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Winners pt3:
The comments to this entry are closed.
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
| 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
| 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 |
| 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 |
| 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
Outstanding conference.
We have to do it again next year because it could be utterly awesome if we finessed it a little.
I could have done with some more really big thinkers and more really big thinking not just people's usual schtick - there were some real exceptions to this (Greg, Justin, Chris in particular).
Oddly enough I think the result was right - Russell was quite genuinely offering the biggest thinking yesterday.
I loved the voting - not for the act of finding a 'winner' but because it transfered the power from the speakers to the delegates - the first conference that I have ever experienced that has achieved this.
And I am guessing but I reckon it got the speekers to raise their games with real variety in the styles of presentation.
Posted by: richard | October 12, 2006 at 01:09 PM